SOLO-2 Trial: LYNPARZA demonstrated PFS benefit in women with gBRCAm* recurrent ovarian cancer1,2

Select from topics on the page

REVIEW IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION BELOW.

*Select patients for this indication based on an FDA-approved companion diagnostic.1

SOLO-2 Study Design

SOLO-2 was a randomized, phase 3 study of 295 patients with a gBRCA1 and/or gBRCA2 mutation with platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer who received ≥2 prior lines of platinum-containing regimens.

Patients were randomized 2:1 (N=295):

  • LYNPARZA tablets 300 mg BID (n=196)
  • Placebo BID (n=99)

Nearly 4x longer PFS with LYNPARZA vs placebo*

Nearly 4x longer PFS with LYNPARZA vs placebo graph Nearly 4x longer PFS with LYNPARZA vs placebo graph
  • *All patients had a deleterious or suspected deleterious gBRCAm as detected either by a local test (n=236) or by a central Myriad Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) test (n=59), subsequently confirmed by BRACAnalysis CDx® (n=286).1
  • The immature overall survival data showed no difference between the groups.2

Sensitivity analysis of PFS by BICR was consistent with investigator-assessed results2

Once the treating HCP determines that the patient has progressed clinically, no further scans are sent for. As a result, the BICR patient is “informatively censored.” Informative censoring may bias the estimate of treatment effect based on BICR.

LYNPARZA (n=196)
Number of events: 81 (41.3%)
Median PFS: 30.2 months

PLACEBO (n=99)
Number of events: 70 (70.7%)
Median PFS: 5.5 months

HR=0.25 (95% CI: 0.18–0.35)

In women with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer with a gBRCAm

SOLO-2: Median OS was 51.7 months with LYNPARZA and 38.8 months with placebo1

Median OS was 51.7 months with LYNPARZA and 38.8 months with placebo graph Median OS was 51.7 months with LYNPARZA and 38.8 months with placebo graph
  • 5-year OS for LYNPARZA was 42% vs 33% with placebo3
  • 5-year OS data were derived from Kaplan–Meier estimates. These analyses are descriptive only. The SOLO-2 trial was not powered to assess a statistical difference in OS between treatment groups at 5 years2,3

Although OS was a prespecified secondary endpoint, the criterion for statistical significance (P<0.05) was not met. HR is unadjusted for crossover.3

*The P-value is derived from a stratified log-rank test.1